Three years ago I cold-messaged a cleaning operator in Glasgow on LinkedIn.
I didn’t know much about him — just that he was running a cleaning business and thinking about growth differently to most operators I’d come across.
That conversation turned out to be one of the most useful I’ve had.
Not because James Fitzpatrick had cracked deal-making. But because he’d done something harder first: he’d built a business that could actually absorb another one.
You can watch the full episode here:
That’s the lesson. Not how to find deals. How to be ready for them.
He built the platform before he bought anything
James is the managing director of AL Scrubz, an award-winning commercial cleaning business. Acquisitions drive the business’s growth.
But James didn’t start with acquisitions. He started with the basics — oven cleaning, carpet cleaning, tenancy cleans. Over time, that turned into a serious commercial operation. AL Scrubz won Best Cleaning Company in the UK at the 2022 DCBN awards. That didn’t come from deal-making. It came from years of tightening the fundamentals.
When we talked, James described his early years. Cleaning until midnight, running rotas, handling quotes, invoices, and client calls. His mum was on the tools alongside him. The business had revenue. It didn’t have a system.
Before he started thinking about acquisitions, James made three deliberate choices:
He sold off the carpet-cleaning side and stopped chasing ad hoc work.
He refocused on recurring commercial contracts — offices, GP surgeries, salons. Revenue that repeats without being re-won every month.
He brought his mum into the office full-time. Emails, quotes, invoices — handled.
“If you’re spending time in the office, ideas start flowing. You can’t do that if you’re constantly cleaning.”
He also standardised his operations, breaking up inefficient two-person van runs into solo routes so the team could handle four jobs a day instead of managing scattered visits.
Supervisors followed, then a management layer. He trained his supervisor into a manager who can price jobs, handle clients, and run daily operations without James present. This freed James to focus entirely on acquisition.
He built capacity before looking for deals.
That’s the sequence. Not: buy businesses, then figure out the management structure. Build the management structure first, then buy.
Most operators flip this. They win a deal, then scramble to run two businesses with the same management bandwidth they had for one. I made that mistake. It’s the most common reason integration fails.
The problem isn’t dealflow. Its integration capacity.
Most people starting a buy-and-build ask: How many deals can I find?
The better question is: How many businesses can I successfully integrate at once?
These are different problems. One is about sourcing. The other is operational. In my experience, operators underestimate the second. I did.
There’s a version of the buy-and-build argument that makes it sound safer than organic growth. In some ways, it is. But not in the way most people think.
Organic growth risk is a sales-and-marketing problem. You’re betting on your ability to win clients, keep staff, and compound revenue from zero.
Acquisition risk is a diligence and integration problem. You’re betting on your ability to understand what you’re buying and running it better than the seller.
James chose to buy cleaning businesses because he’d built years of hands-on operating experience. That knowledge gave him an edge. He can walk into an acquired business and improve it — not just own it.
Financial buyers acquire revenue. Operator-buyers acquire an improvement opportunity. James is firmly the second type. That distinction matters when things go wrong post-completion.
Why cleaning is ripe for roll-ups
Cleaning is one of the most roll-up-friendly service markets in the UK.
It’s fragmented. Tens of thousands of businesses, almost all owner-led, most below £2M. No dominant consolidator. No platform player with a meaningful national share.
It’s under-systemised. Most cleaning businesses operate in WhatsApp groups, spreadsheets, and on the founder’s mobile. Almost every business can be improved by someone who has already built the systems once.
And the succession problem is real. Thousands of operators in their 50s with no management layer, no exit plan, and no obvious next move. They want out. They just don’t know what that looks like.
That’s the opening. And it’s why direct outreach, done right, works.
The best deals don’t come to market
James sources acquisition targets with personal letters. Physical post. Fifty a week.
He doesn’t wait for broker listings. He sends straightforward letters directly to owners he’d like to buy. The pitch is deliberately soft:
“Hi, I’m James. I’m actively looking to buy a business. If you’re ever thinking about it in the future, it won’t hurt to have a chat.”
Stamps. Envelopes. That’s the entire budget.
No broker. No auction. No inflated valuation from someone whose fee depends on the headline number.
He’s direct about the broker problem: they overvalue businesses to justify their fee. The result is a business that sits on the market for five or six years at a price nobody will pay. The seller gets frustrated. The deal dies.
Direct outreach cuts through all that. It reaches the owner before they’ve called a broker. Before the process gets competitive. Before the valuation gets inflated.
Letters work because most business owners never receive a direct approach from someone who understands their sector. And because James has a visible, award-winning business, the letter isn’t arriving from a stranger.
His acquisition criteria:
Five or more years in business
£500K+ turnover outside Scotland; £200–300K within Scotland, where his management team can cover it
A management structure already in place — he won’t buy himself a job he’s already escaped
Recurring, contracted revenue
It might take six months. It might take two years. You only need one.
What to actually diligence
The P&L tells you what the business has done. It doesn’t tell you what it will do once the owner leaves.
James looks past the numbers at the questions that determine integration risk:
Is the revenue recurring or ad hoc?
How concentrated is the client base? Lose one client, lose a third of the business?
Are contracts transferable — or personal to the founder?
Is the staff stable, or is there a churn problem?
How involved is the owner day-to-day, and what walks out the door with them?
These questions tell you what you’re actually buying. They’re questions most first-time buyers skip because they’re focused on the deal, not the day after.
Here’s the frame I keep coming back to: bad revenue is harder to fix than low revenue. Low revenue has a clear problem. Bad revenue looks fine until the owner leaves. Then you’re repricing contracts, re-winning clients, and working a cost base that was never built to match what you paid.
James doesn’t do this alone. He has a JV partner with 30 years of experience in account review and finance structuring. He uses M&A-specialist accountants and solicitors. He has a mentor who has been through the process before.
“I’m not going into this with no knowledge.”
The point isn’t to outsource the thinking. It’s to avoid walking into a deal with blind spots you could have closed. First-time buyers who do due diligence alone are where integration failures start.
This is the area I’m focused on building. The financial modelling, the diligence structure, and the advisor relationships. I didn’t get this right in 2015 with Pro Clean. I’m not making the same mistake twice.
Integration creates or destroys value
Buying a cleaning business is achievable with the right capital and patience. Running it better after you buy it — that’s the actual skill.
The integration risks in cleaning:
Staff retention. Cleaners can walk. If the acquisition depends on a particular site team and they leave in month two, the revenue goes with them.
Pricing alignment. The acquired business may be underpriced relative to your cost model. Raising prices post-completion is one of the highest-risk moves you can make in year one.
System rollout. James runs AL Scrubz on digital check-in and check-out, timestamped task checklists, monthly site audits, and a quality league table visible to all staff. Rolling that into an acquired team takes time, training, and management bandwidth.
Service quality. Clients don’t notice when the system changes. They notice when the standard drops. Consistent quality during the transition is the hardest operational problem in the first ninety days.
James’s edge is that he’s already solved these problems once. He has a reusable playbook. A management structure that can extend to many sites. A business that can operate without him.
When he acquires, he’s not building from scratch. He’s extending something that already works.
Systems are the asset. Not the deal.
Financial buyers want the revenue. They’re doing multiple arbitrage — buy at 3x, grow, exit at 5–6x. The business is a number on a spreadsheet.
Operator-buyers want the improvement opportunity. They’re betting that their system, applied to a weaker business, creates real value. The business is a platform.
James is in the second camp. The years he’s spent building AL Scrubz — the routes, the quality systems, the management layer, the community standing — that’s not just experience. That’s the moat.
He’s not going in as a first-time buyer, figuring it out. He’s going in as an operator who’s already solved the hard problems once, applying them to businesses that haven’t solved them yet.
Anyone can buy a cleaning business. Few can make one better within twelve months.
That’s the edge worth building. And it has to exist before the first deal closes — not after.
What I take from this
James’s story isn’t a highlight reel. It’s a series of practical moves by an operator who knows his sector and has built something capable of integrating other businesses without breaking.
Build the platform. Create the management layer. Source deals. Build the right advisor team. Define the acquisition profile. Use your reputation as a tool.
This isn’t complicated. Most of it is discipline and the willingness to learn from the experience.
That’s what I’m building. James is further along the same road.
That’s all for this week.
Matt Harris
The Growth Lab
This post is based on a conversation I had with James on The Growth Lab Podcast. You can listen to the full episode here:
The Growth Lab Capital is actively acquiring Soft FM businesses across London, Central, and the South East of England. If you’re an operator thinking about what comes next — even if it’s not today — I’d welcome a conversation. No broker. No pressure. Book a time here.
The Growth Lab newsletter is a playbook for buy-and-build by Soft FM operators. Deals, growth, operations — no theory, no fluff. Subscribe for the next one.
💼 Daily on LinkedIn — Soft FM buy-and-build, deals, and market intel across FM, housing associations, and construction. 4,000+ follow. Join them here.
𝕏 Building this in public on X. Soft FM. Buy & Build. Same operator, less polish. Follow here.