25% of your monthly revenue. Gone in six weeks.

What do you do next?

Most operators panic and discount. Josh Melton did something harder: he stopped.

In the six weeks between Thanksgiving and Christmas 2018, that’s exactly what happened to Athens Cleaning. Normal client churn. Some contracts ended, and the scope of other accounts reduced. The kind of thing that happens to almost every commercial cleaning business.

The event exposed something Josh had been avoiding for years.

Athens Cleaning had no ideal client profile. No operational values. No systematic way to hire. The business served anyone who’d pay. All held together by Josh’s ability to hustle.

I interviewed Josh on The Growth Lab podcast in January 2023.

This is a breakdown of what happened next. How Josh rebuilt Athens Cleaning. And why the business tripled.

Reactive vs Proactive

When revenue drops 25% in six weeks, most operators panic.

They discount to win deals back. They chase any revenue regardless of fit. They increase activity without increasing clarity.

Reaction feels like action, but it only compounds the problem.

  • Discounting erodes margin and brand positioning.

  • Wrong-fit clients create operational chaos and hurt retention.

  • Activity without clarity keeps you busy but stuck.

Josh didn’t take the reactive path.

He stopped chasing new revenue long enough to fix the foundation. He analysed his client base for accounts that:

  • had the best retention,

  • generated the best margin, and

  • provided the easiest operational fit.

Next, he wrote down everything broken in the business. A pattern emerged and he wrote down solutions:

Problem: Team members didn’t seem to care about quality

Solution: The business needs people with character who do the right things when no one’s watching

Problem: Clients complained, and the business found out too late

Solution: Proactive communication prevents clients from raising complaints

Problem: Staff weren’t showing up or checking in properly

Solution: The business needs people who give a shit about doing the right thing

Josh grouped the solutions into three categories: Character, Care, and Communication.

Then he asked himself three questions:

  1. Who are we built to serve? Not “who will pay us”.

  1. What do we stand for? Not aspirational values — what operational principles can we use as decision filters?

  1. What kind of business are we actually building? Not “successful” — what specific category, what specific reputation?

Answering these questions meant saying no to revenue. Most operators avoid this for the same reason: pausing feels like losing momentum.

Josh’s decision wasn’t about defining Athen’s Cleaning ICP, values or positioning. The decision was whether to do this proactively or reactively.

Proactive meant controlling the timing. Reactive meant the marketing forcing his hand.

Josh chose to be proactive. But only just.

The First Structural Change: ICP Clarity

Until this point, Athens Cleaning accepted any client who’d pay. Retail stores. Construction sites. Medical offices. Bank branches. Law firms.

No pattern. No focus. No compound advantage.

Every new client started from zero. Sales felt random. Referrals didn’t stick. A retail client would refer another retail contact, but Athens’s case studies showed medical offices. The referral would lose confidence.

Team capability didn’t transfer. The person who cleaned the law firm couldn’t just move to the medical office. Different requirements. Different standards. Different buyer expectations.

The ICP decision

Josh made one decision that changed everything.

He defined Athens ICP.

Now, Athens Cleaning serves bank branches and medical offices. Small-format professional environments. Two to three-hour cleans multiple times per week. Cleaned by part-time professionals.

Not bigger accounts. Not diverse sectors. Smaller, specific, repeatable.

Why bank branches and medical offices?

  • Clean environments — low variance week-to-week, no heavy industrial mess.

  • Professional buyers who value relationship over price, care about consistency, reliability, and compliance.

  • Repeatable contract structure that one person can handle. Predictable enough to schedule systematically.

ICP defined, Josh said no to large corporate headquarters, construction sites and retail stores. He no longer accepted once-per-week contracts and cost-driven buyers.

Every “no” felt like lost revenue. And in the short term, it was.

But every “no” also sharpened Athens Cleaning’s positioning for the long term.

What changed

  1. Messaging got specific.

Instead of “quality cleaning services for commercial clients,” it became “two to three-hour professional cleans, multiple times per week, by professionals.”Bank and medical office managers understood exactly what they were getting.

  1. Referrals started sticking.

One bank manager referred Athens to another. Case studies matched, capabilities aligned, and referrals had confidence.

  1. Sales conversations became a qualification.

Not “Can we do this?” but “Does this fit our model?” Bank branch? Yes. Medical office? Yes. Retail store, construction site or corporate HQ? No — here’s who we’d recommend instead.

  1. The team knew who to target.

Is it a bank branch or a medical office? Is it 2–3 hours? Multiple times per week? Yes to all three — pursue. No to any — qualify out.

When I spoke with Josh, Athens Cleaning was known for cleaning banks and doctors’ offices.

Not the company that cleans everything.

The company with a category.

The Second Structural Change: The Filters Nobody Writes Down

Most companies write Mission, Vision, and Values as marketing copy. Aspirational statements sound good on websites, but don’t change anything operationally.

Josh developed three filters instead.

  1. Mission: “We go above and beyond to serve people.”

Not “deliver quality service.”

Go above and beyond — operationally, relationally, systematically. If a team member wasn’t willing to, they didn’t fit.

  1. Vision: “We are respected by our clients, appreciated by our team members, and remembered by our community.”

Three specific reputation markers — each measurable. Do clients respect us? Ask them. Do team members feel appreciated? Survey them. Does the community remember us? Check involvement.

  1. Core Values: Character. Care. Communication.

Not twelve corporate values. Three filters that force decisions.

Character: Do the right things even when no one’s watching. Cut corners — you’re out.

Care: Give a damn about doing the right thing. Clock in, clock out, nothing more — you’re out.

Communication: Proactive, not reactive. Beat clients to complaints. Document issues before they escalate. Wait for problems to blow up — you’re out.

Josh used these filters in job ads, client conversations and operations.

The right people, clients and team members self-selected in.

The Third Structural Change: Team Avatars

Before Josh defined team avatars, hiring was reactive.

Post a cleaning job ad. See who applies. Interview them. Hope they work out. High turnover. Inconsistent capability. No systematic way to find the right people.

Josh changed the approach. He built three specific profiles around the best-performing team members. The ones who stayed longest got the best client feedback and needed the least management.

  • Just Getting Started Joanne: Early career. 22–28. Works a professional day job. Needs extra income to clear student loans or save for a major purchase. Available 3–4 evenings per week, 2–3 hours per shift.

  • Soon-to-Retire Stephanie: 55–65. Works a desk job, wants physical activity. Needs to accelerate retirement savings. Prefers evening work after her day job ends.

  • Homeschool Mom Megan: Stay-at-home parent. Needs income and a structured break. Available during school activities — evenings when kids are at sports, music, or clubs. Values flexible but reliable hours.

How avatars changed hiring

Old job ad: “Cleaning jobs available. Flexible hours. Good pay. Apply now.”

New job ad: “Side gig for office managers and bank tellers. 2–3 hours, 3–4 evenings per week. Professional environments only — bank branches and medical offices. We’re looking for people who already work in professional settings and want structured side income.”

The second ad attracted exactly who Athens wanted. The ad did the pre-qualification.

Josh built a team that matched the clients. Professional cleaners in professional environments.

How the Three Decisions Connected

The system wasn’t three separate decisions. It was one integrated framework.

  • ICP determined team. Without ICP clarity, Josh couldn’t have defined team avatars. First, he needed to determine bank branches and medical offices as the ICP. Then he could identify the need for part-time professionals rather than full-time cleaners.

  • Team determined relationship approach. Professional cleaners visiting professional environments enabled relationship building. Proactive daytime check-ins, bring coffee, speak the buyer’s language, and build trust.

  • The relationship approach determined retention. Proactive check-ins beat clients to complaints. Building trust meant quality issues became “Hey Josh, can you fix this?” instead of “We’re switching companies.” The first bank branch Athens ever signed is still a client today — sixteen years later.

Each decision enabled the next.

Without ICP clarity, you can’t define team avatars — you don’t know who you need.

Without team avatars, you can’t build a relationship system — you don’t know what your team can execute.

Without a relationship system, you can’t keep clients systematically — retention stays founder-dependent.

The Result

From the moment Athens lost 25% of revenue in late 2018 to when Josh and I spoke in January 2023, the business had tripled.

Not from geographic expansion. Not from new service lines. Not from acquisition.

From focus and foundation.

You can grow to £5m, £7m, £10m on founder hustle and opportunistic wins.

But the market will eventually test your foundation.

A client will leave. A team member will quit. A competitor will undercut you. A procurement process will ask: “What makes you different?” If your business is held together by your ability to hustle rather than by structural identity, the test will expose it.

Athens’s test came in late 2018. It cost 25% of revenue. But it gave them the clarity that tripled the business.

What will your test cost?

💡 If you enjoyed this issue, share it with a friend.

That’s all for this week,

Matt Harris

P.S.

💼 I share daily Soft FM growth insights on LinkedIn. Join 4,000+ leaders learning how to win more contracts. Connect here.

🐦 Want quick-hit tactics in real time? Follow me on X (@iam_mattharris) for daily sales lessons from the field. Follow here.